Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike MacEacheran results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 2,006 hits. Analysis detected 7,568 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,517 of 6,196 authors). This Mike MacEacheran is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Mike MacEacheran
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
60%Mike MacEacheran (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,436
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510059.4% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 27.0%27.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 14.1%14.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Indoctrination: Author 27.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 14.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%IndoctrinationSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos