Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 908 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Koziatek results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , In-Group Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 584 hits . Analysis detected 3,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 89% (793 of 6,629 authors). This Mike Koziatek is worse (more manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group. Mike Koziatek
Author details
Total words: 2,724
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.1% percentile 6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 21.4% 21.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 18.5% 18.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 18.8% 18.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 13.2% 13.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 9.4% 9.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.3% 12.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 21.4%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 18.8%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Author 18.5%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Special Pleading: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst