Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 981 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Crawley results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 353 hits . Analysis detected 2,544 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,943 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,263 of 6,628 authors). This Mike Crawley is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group. Mike Crawley
Author details
Total words: 2,943
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst