Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 804 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mika Brzezinski results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50.6% saturation with 814 hits . Analysis detected 3,525 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of 95% (351 of 6,348 authors). This Mika Brzezinski is worse (more manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group. Mika Brzezinski
Author details
Total words: 1,608
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.5% percentile 10.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 50.6% 50.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 28.4% 28.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 22.1% 22.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 18.2% 18.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 26.9% 26.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 13.9% 13.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Emotion: Author 50.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 28.4%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Author 26.9%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 24.6%, sitewide 26.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 22.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 18.2%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 13.9%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Loss Aversion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Primacy Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.6% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst