Author summary
44%2 analyzed articles/videos1,262 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michelle Baruchman results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Unattributed Quote, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 801 hits. Analysis detected 4,248 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,048 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,941 of 6,628 authors). This Michelle Baruchman is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Michelle Baruchman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
41%Michelle Baruchman (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,048
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

41% percentile
025507510040.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 15.9%15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.0%10.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 15.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate