Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michaeleen Doucleff results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 658 hits . Analysis detected 4,864 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,882 of 6,628 authors). This Michaeleen Doucleff is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group. Michaeleen Doucleff
Author details
Total words: 3,536
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.6% percentile 3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 15.1% 15.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 18.6% 18.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.8% 14.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 18.6%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 15.1%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Nature: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst