Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Quinlan results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 682 hits . Analysis detected 6,518 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,364 of 6,382 authors). This Michael Quinlan is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group. Michael Quinlan
Author details
Total words: 7,436
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst