Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Michael Koncewicz results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 1,316 hits . Analysis detected 10,596 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This Michael Koncewicz is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Michael Koncewicz
Author details
Total words: 8,480
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.5% 15.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.2% 12.2% Politically Left Leaning ⌠Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.7% 8.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst