Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael E. O'Hanlon results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Indoctrination , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 618 hits . Analysis detected 4,158 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of â 64% (2,431 of 6,628 authors). This Michael E. O'Hanlon is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. Michael E. O'Hanlon
Author details
Total words: 4,500
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.3% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.7% 13.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst