Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video817 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Copley results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 693 hits. Analysis detected 3,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,292 of 6,628 authors). This Michael Copley is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Michael Copley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
81%Michael Copley (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,268
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

81% percentile
025507510080.5% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 21.2%21.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 18.7%18.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.2%12.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.4%5.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.2%5.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Author 21.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 18.7%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Loss Aversion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.6%Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos