Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Micah Nathan results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 720 hits . Analysis detected 7,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,297 of 6,135 authors). This Micah Nathan is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group. Micah Nathan
Author details
Total words: 5,712
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.6% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.6% 9.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.6% 12.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.2%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.6%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst