Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,904 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Micah Nathan results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 720 hits. Analysis detected 7,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,297 of 6,135 authors). This Micah Nathan is worse (more manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Micah Nathan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
63%Micah Nathan (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,712
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510062.6% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 9.6%9.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 12.6%12.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Author 9.6%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Author 8.6%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos