Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Mia Messina results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 423 hits. Analysis detected 1,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,250 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,353 authors). This Mia Messina is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Mia Messina
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Mia Messina (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 4,250
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos