Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,221 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megan Gandy results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Slippery Slope , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 674 hits . Analysis detected 5,543 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,484 of 6,321 authors). This Megan Gandy is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Megan Gandy
Author details
Total words: 4,884
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.5% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.8% 13.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.3% 10.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.8%, sitewide 8.1% Slippery Slope: Author 11.1%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Composition/Division: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst