Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 866 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meg Britton-Mehlisch results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Halo Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 220 hits . Analysis detected 1,850 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ā 25% (4,997 of 6,628 authors). This Meg Britton-Mehlisch is better (less manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group. Meg Britton-Mehlisch
Author details
Total words: 3,464
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst