Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Max Tani results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 382 hits . Analysis detected 2,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Max Tani is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Max Tani
Author details
Total words: 1,692
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 22.6% 22.6% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 8.3% 8.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 22.6%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 8.9%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Horn Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Composition/Division: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst