Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Matthew Mitchell results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 630 hits . Analysis detected 2,917 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,438 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,244 authors). This Matthew Mitchell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Matthew Mitchell
Author details
Total words: 3,438
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst