Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Matthew Cantor results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 487 hits. Analysis detected 2,647 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Matthew Cantor is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Matthew Cantor
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Matthew Cantor (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 3,940
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 12.4%12.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 12.4%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos