Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 421 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Tate results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 381 hits . Analysis detected 2,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,073 of 6,604 authors). This Matt Tate is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. Matt Tate
Author details
Total words: 1,684
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.8% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.6% 22.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 17.1% 17.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.9% 7.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 17.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Author 7.9%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst