Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Matt Hadro results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 1,210 hits . Analysis detected 10,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Matt Hadro is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Matt Hadro
Author details
Total words: 6,120
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 19.8% 19.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.0% 17.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 6.6% 6.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 19.8%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.3%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Author 7.7%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Burden of Proof: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.4% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.1% Horn Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.0% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst