Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Gertz results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.6% saturation with 1,702 hits . Analysis detected 9,238 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,059 of 6,628 authors). This Matt Gertz is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group. Matt Gertz
Author details
Total words: 5,388
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.0% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 31.6% 31.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 25.6% 25.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.5% 10.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 9.0% 9.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.7% 12.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 31.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 25.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst