Author summary
54% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,083 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Elliott results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 1,075 hits . Analysis detected 8,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,806 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,978 of 6,628 authors). This Matt Elliott is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. Matt Elliott
Author details
Total words: 7,806
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.1% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.8% 13.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.8%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 11.8%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst