Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mathew Rodriguez results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 1,038 hits . Analysis detected 9,644 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,037 of 6,348 authors). This Mathew Rodriguez is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group. Mathew Rodriguez
Author details
Total words: 4,648
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.7% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 16.8% 16.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.5% 18.5% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 14.3% 14.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 18.9% 18.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 22.3% 22.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 22.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.4%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 18.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.5%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 16.8%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 14.3%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 12.7%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 12.4%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.9%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.9%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst