Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Maryann Martinez For Dailymail.Com results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 486 hits. Analysis detected 2,437 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,516 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Maryann Martinez For Dailymail.Com is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Maryann Martinez For Dailymail.Com
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Maryann Martinez For Dailymail.Com (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,516
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 19.3%19.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.5%8.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.1%15.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 19.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 7.5%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos