Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mary Jo McConahay results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 968 hits. Analysis detected 7,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,630 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Mary Jo McConahay is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Mary Jo McConahay
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Mary Jo McConahay (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 6,630
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 14.6%14.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.6%14.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Horn Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos