Author summary
44% 1 analyzed article/video 615 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Spoonauer results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 321 hits . Analysis detected 2,310 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,508 of 6,628 authors). This Mark Spoonauer is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. Mark Spoonauer
Author details
Total words: 2,460
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.2% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.1% 13.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.5% 5.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst