Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Saunokonoko results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 709 hits . Analysis detected 4,218 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,322 of 6,235 authors). This Mark Saunokonoko is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group. Mark Saunokonoko
Author details
Total words: 8,656
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst