Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,329 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Piesing results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 865 hits . Analysis detected 6,116 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,564 of 6,628 authors). This Mark Piesing is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group. Mark Piesing
Author details
Total words: 9,316
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst