Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mark Healey results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Hasty Generalization, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.1% saturation with 406 hits. Analysis detected 2,770 faulty-reasoning hits from 900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,254 authors). This Mark Healey is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Mark Healey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Mark Healey (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 900
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles900 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 45.1%45.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 37.0%37.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 34.7%34.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 25.9%25.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 20.8%20.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 20.6%20.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 16.0%16.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 10.4%10.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 45.1%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Author 37.0%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 34.7%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 25.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 20.8%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Author 20.6%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Author 16.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.6%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 9.7%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Author 9.4%, sitewide 0.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.2%Special Pleading: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.3%Primacy Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos