Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marina Henke results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Pessimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 507 hits . Analysis detected 5,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,712 of 6,217 authors). This Marina Henke is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group. Marina Henke
Author details
Total words: 8,500
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst