Author summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maria Temming results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 153 hits . Analysis detected 1,147 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,563 of 6,628 authors). This Maria Temming is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group. Maria Temming
Author details
Total words: 1,104
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.4% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.7% 10.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.4% 7.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 13.9% 13.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 13.9%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 11.1%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.2% Composition/Division: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst