Author summary
78% 2 analyzed articles/videos 536 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maria Mocerino results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 29.9% saturation with 1,156 hits . Analysis detected 5,481 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,872 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 86% (889 of 6,348 authors). This Maria Mocerino is worse (more manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group. Maria Mocerino
Author details
Total words: 3,872
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.0% percentile 5.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 29.9% 29.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.8% 14.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Author 29.9%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 14.8%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 12.3%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst