Author summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Margaret Coker results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 961 hits . Analysis detected 7,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,950 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,560 of 6,629 authors). This Margaret Coker is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Margaret Coker
Author details
Total words: 7,950
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.1% 12.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst