Author summary
88% 1 analyzed article/video 880 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marc H. Morial results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 518 hits . Analysis detected 3,289 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,640 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,565 of 6,628 authors). This Marc H. Morial is worse (more manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group. Marc H. Morial
Author details
Total words: 2,640
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.4% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 15.0% 15.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.6% 19.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.1% 8.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 15.0%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.1%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst