Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manoush Zomorodi results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 417 hits . Analysis detected 3,054 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,818 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,333 of 6,628 authors). This Manoush Zomorodi is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Manoush Zomorodi
Author details
Total words: 2,818
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.0% 10.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.8% 14.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 9.0% 9.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Straw Man: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst