Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video124 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Makiko Yamazaki results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 56.3% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 960 faulty-reasoning hits from 496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.6% and a BS Rank of 99% (107 of 6,628 authors). This Makiko Yamazaki is worse (more manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group.
Makiko Yamazaki
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
99%Makiko Yamazaki (selected)18%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 496
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

98% percentile
025507510098.4% percentile
17.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles496 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 36.1%36.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 56.3%56.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 21.6%21.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Author 15.7%15.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 21.6%21.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 7.7%7.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 7.7%7.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 7.9%7.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Author 56.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 21.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 21.6%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 15.7%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.9%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos