Author summary
75% 1 analyzed article/video 1,070 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maine Morning Star results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 381 hits . Analysis detected 2,267 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,210 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,274 of 6,628 authors). This Maine Morning Star is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group. Maine Morning Star
Author details
Total words: 3,210
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.9% 11.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst