Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video118 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maggie Penman results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 389 faulty-reasoning hits from 472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 86% (944 of 6,629 authors). This Maggie Penman is worse (more manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group.
Maggie Penman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
86%Maggie Penman (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 472
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510085.8% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles472 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.0%3.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 10.2%10.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 10.2%10.2%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Author 7.2%7.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.0%7.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Author 10.2%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Author 10.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%Middle Ground: Author 7.2%, sitewide 0.1%Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos