Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,547 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maggie Downs results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 244 hits. Analysis detected 2,389 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,188 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (6,300 of 6,628 authors). This Maggie Downs is better (less manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group.
Maggie Downs
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠5%Maggie Downs (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,188
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

5% percentile
02550751004.9% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos