Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video946 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madeleine Lippey results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 899 hits. Analysis detected 4,635 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,211 of 6,364 authors). This Madeleine Lippey is worse (more manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group.
Madeleine Lippey
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
66%Madeleine Lippey (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,784
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

65% percentile
025507510065.3% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 23.8%23.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.8%4.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos