Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lawrence O’Donnell results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 101 hits . Analysis detected 589 faulty-reasoning hits from 362 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of 95% (388 of 6,628 authors). This Lawrence O’Donnell is worse (more manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group. Lawrence O’Donnell
Author details
Total words: 362
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.2% percentile 9.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles362 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 23.5% 23.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 27.9% 27.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 26.2% 26.2% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.3% 21.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.4% 9.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Author 27.9%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Author 21.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 26.2%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 23.5%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Author 11.1%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst