Author summary
73%1 analyzed article/video276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lawrence Bonk results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 919 faulty-reasoning hits from 828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,068 of 6,244 authors). This Lawrence Bonk is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Lawrence Bonk
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
83%Lawrence Bonk (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 828
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

83% percentile
025507510082.9% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles828 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.9%14.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.2%8.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 11.1%11.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.6%5.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.7%1.7%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Author 11.1%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Composition/Division: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos