Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,091 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Aratani results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 391 hits. Analysis detected 3,533 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,653 of 6,628 authors). This Lauren Aratani is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
Lauren Aratani
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
60%Lauren Aratani (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,364
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

60% percentile
025507510060.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 4.6%4.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 9.0%9.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Tu Quoque: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos