Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,583 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lakshmi Sarah results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 914 hits. Analysis detected 5,297 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,749 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (3,919 of 6,266 authors). This Lakshmi Sarah is better (less manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group.
Lakshmi Sarah
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠38%Lakshmi Sarah (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,749
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

38% percentile
025507510037.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 11.8%11.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.4%5.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos