Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyoko Hasegawa results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37.9% saturation with 182 hits. Analysis detected 1,279 faulty-reasoning hits from 480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.7% and a BS Rank of 99% (119 of 6,628 authors). This Kyoko Hasegawa is worse (more manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.
Kyoko Hasegawa
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
99%Kyoko Hasegawa (selected)17%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 480
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

98% percentile
025507510098.2% percentile
16.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles480 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 31.0%31.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 28.8%28.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 36.3%36.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 37.7%37.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 21.3%21.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 37.9%37.9%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 7.5%7.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 6.9%6.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 8.3%8.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 37.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 37.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 36.3%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Author 31.0%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 21.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.3%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos