Author summary
89% 2 analyzed articles/videos 283 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyle Logan results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Overconfidence Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 42.5% saturation with 798 hits . Analysis detected 2,270 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,878 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,727 of 6,628 authors). This Kyle Logan is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group. Kyle Logan
Author details
Total words: 1,878
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.0% percentile 3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 42.5% 42.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 42.5%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst