Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,415 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristin Wright results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 994 hits . Analysis detected 5,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,005 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,278 of 6,134 authors). This Kristin Wright is worse (more manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group. Kristin Wright
Author details
Total words: 5,005
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.9% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.5% 13.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.1% 11.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.8%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst