Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 801 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kirsti Marohn results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Loss Aversion , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 479 hits . Analysis detected 2,456 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,403 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (1,944 of 6,138 authors). This Kirsti Marohn is worse (more manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group. Kirsti Marohn
Author details
Total words: 2,403
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.3% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 19.9% 19.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 7.9% 7.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.9%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Author 19.9%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Loss Aversion: Author 7.9%, sitewide 2.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst