Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Kerem Schamberger results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 870 hits . Analysis detected 7,500 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Kerem Schamberger is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Kerem Schamberger
Author details
Total words: 5,748
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.1% 15.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.5%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst