Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video981 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KEN SWEET AP business writer results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 499 hits. Analysis detected 3,462 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,924 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,945 of 6,367 authors). This KEN SWEET AP business writer is worse (more manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
KEN SWEET AP business writer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
54%KEN SWEET AP business writer (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,924
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

54% percentile
025507510053.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.7%12.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos