Author summary
42%1 analyzed article/video397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Mahan results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 177 hits. Analysis detected 455 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,191 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,201 of 6,628 authors). This Ken Mahan is worse (more manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group.
Ken Mahan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
82%Ken Mahan (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,191
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

82% percentile
025507510081.9% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.9%14.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 4.5%4.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 5.7%5.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 3.8%3.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos